D. J. Bernstein writes: > Explain. Why would it be _harder_ to verify static files? Because they are different than the files on the CDROM. Yes, you could write a program to compare them and ignore the differences. This program might have bugs. These bugs might result in a security hole. You do not seem able to acknowledge this possibility. You are only able to acknowledge the fact that qmail might have bugs if you add extra code to it. Why is qmail more susceptible to bugs than Redhat's RPM code? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Verifying system bin... Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Red Hat Linux and Frivolous forki... Kai MacTane
- Re: Frivolous forking listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski
- System integrity verification and oth... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verificatio... Peter C. Norton
- Re: System integrity verific... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity ver... Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity ver... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity ver... Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity ver... Dax Kelson
- Re: System integrity ver... Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity ver... Peter C. Norton
- Re: System integrity ver... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity ver... Peter C. Norton
- Re: System integrity verificatio... Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity verific... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity ver... davidm
