Re: Frivolous forking

[Rask Ingemann Lambertsen]

On 22-Dec-98 21:45:36, Scott Ballantyne wrote something about "Re: Frivolous forking". 
I just couldn't help replying to it, thus:

> Let's see. this endless argument seems to be hammering home that
> Redhat feels that Sendmail + RPM is more secure than qmail without
> RPM.

   No. You missed the point by a country mile. For a start, have a look at
<URL:ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/qmail/dist.html>.

Regards,

/������������������������������T�����������������������������������������\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen     | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer  | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/   |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64)  | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC      |
|       User - a technical term used by computer pros. See idiot.        |