Got it.
That's the one problem when mathematicans start to program.
Usually very little attention is being paid to performance
optimizations.
One can actually see that in qmail. Well thought out and
very modular. Lots of performance expensive design decisions though.
If SPAMmers can do 200K messages per hour then we should be
able to do that as well when sending legit stuff!
Dirk
PS. Hehe... yes, I'm trying to provoke somebody into more
performance.... ;)
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 04:42:32PM +0200, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> + [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> | > >Is qmail 2.0 out?
> | >
> | > No, but it promises dramtically improved queue performance.
> |
> | Do we have an ETA?
>
> Nope. Dan is too smart for that. Too many software developers have
> been burned by suggesting a delivery date, then finding their release
> slip by weeks, months, even years. Qmail 2 will come when it comes.
> Don't hold your breath or even make plans to use it: Dan has other
> stuff on his mind, like teaching and suing the US government.
>
> There is one bit of information, though: qmail 2 is supposed to use
> something called zeroseek to handle the queue. Dan has created a
> mailing list for discussions of zeroseek, but so far he has released
> nothing that we could discuss. It may well be a long wait.
>
> - Harald
