hi , My two 5 cents. I have success in running QMail after a bit of hacking. First I was never running mail system on Linux till now, second I know nothing about SendMail. IMHO : 1. QMAIL is easy to install only and only and only when you install it once, till your first install you must do alot of hacking. 2. Docs are very bad and unordered. I meant that they are hard to understand, not that they are useless. (But this is the problem of Linux at all, by "default" programmers are not people that can write good documentation even if they can make a great products). 3. I think that the configuration is unnatural, but this may be is 'cause I'm just testing it at the moment and have no big experience with QMAIL. Most of you are right that everything that you want to use must be first tested. 4. It is free, so if anyone don't like it, you can skip it !!! ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Justin Bell
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendma... Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for se... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Fabrice Scemama
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Adam D. McKenna
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Patrick Berry
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail ddb
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail ivan
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Martin
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Fabrice Scemama
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Jordan Krushen
