Rask Ingemann Lambertsen writes: > Most other anti-spam measures have a technical foundation. Invalid domain, > header field syntax error, no or incorrect reverse DNS, etc. Blocking dialups > doesn't. IMHO, it comes dangerously close to racism. The term is "prejudice", not racism. Race isn't a factor here. And it's a reasonable prejudice, since all of the non-relayed spam I get comes from dialups. Not all prejudice is bad. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- RE: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Bo Fussing
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spa... Vince Vielhaber
- RE: Three solutions for spa... James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for... Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for... James Smallacombe
- Re: Three solutions for... Luca Olivetti
