On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:19:33AM -0500, Len Budney wrote: > Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rask Ingemann Lambertsen writes: > > > Most other anti-spam measures have a technical > > > foundation...Blocking dialups doesn't. IMHO, it comes dangerously > > > close to racism. > > > > ...it's a reasonable prejudice, since all of the non-relayed spam I > > get comes from dialups. Well where else would it come from? > And all the crime I've experienced was perpetrated by "those people." > That's why I ready my pepper spray whenever one of "them" comes near > me. > > > Not all prejudice is bad. Yes it is. Greetz, Peter. -- .| Peter van Dijk .| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- RE: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- RE: Three solutions for spam Bo Fussing
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spa... Vince Vielhaber
- RE: Three solutions for spa... James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for... Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for... James Smallacombe
- Re: Three solutions for... Luca Olivetti
- Pattern-matching and fi... Len Budney
- Re: Pattern-matching an... James Smallacombe
- Re: Pattern-matching an... Tim Pierce
