On Wed, 5 May 1999, Fred Lindberg wrote: [snip] > So would: > > killall qmail-send qmail-remote qmail-local Please be careful of recommending "killall". Under linux, it kills processes running the named program. Under solaris, it kills everything. > be a more correct way of doing it? > > Would it be more correct for qmail-send to kill it's children upon > receiving sigterm? > > Thanks! > > -Sincerely, Fred > > (Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA) > > > -- "Life is much too important to be taken seriously." Thomas Erskine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (613) 998-2836
Re: What happens when qmail-send is killed?
thomas . erskine-dated-e60049dfa1e822a2 Thu, 6 May 1999 04:27:19 -0700
- Re: What happens when qma... Mark Delany
- Re: What happens when... Adam D. McKenna
- Re: What happens when... Rick Myers
- Re: What happens ... Mark Delany
- Re: What happens when... ddb
- Re: What happens ... Mark Delany
- Re: What happens when qma... thomas . erskine-dated-f20a46fba97083ca
- Re: What happens when qmail-send i... David Villeger
- Re: What happens when qmail-send i... Fred Lindberg
- Re: What happens when qmail-s... David Villeger
- Re: What happens when qmail-s... thomas . erskine-dated-e60049dfa1e822a2
- Re: What happens when qmail-s... Richard Letts
- Re: What happens when qmail-send i... Fred Lindberg
