Petr Novotny writes: [ if there's a security hole in getpwnam() ] > Then the whole system is fucked up, Not necessarily. There are very few privileged programs that feed untrusted data to getpwnam(), aside from MTAs. Anyway, folks, thanks for participating in the mailing list volume test. On the mailing list machine, at concurrency 120, qmail sustained a rate of 1.5 million deliveries/day. Enjoy the holidays. ---Dan
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Petr Novotny
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Chris Garrigues
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- List volume Dax Kelson
- Re: List volume Roger Merchberger
- Re: List volume Vern Hart
- Re: List volume Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: List volume Mate Wierdl
- Re: List volume Roger Merchberger
- Re: List volume dirk
- Re: Frivolous forking [getpwnam] peak
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
