On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 12:24:05PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > That server is violating RFC 1123, section 5.2.5. You can easily work
> > around the problem by putting www.cheetahmail.com into control/helohost.
> >
> > (I'm considering changing the default HELO in qmail-remote in qmail 2.0
> > to use the bracketed IP address of the client.)
>
> How much of a standard is that?
RFC821:
HELO <SP> <domain> <CRLF>
<domain> ::= <element> | <element> "." <domain>
<element> ::= <name> | "#" <number> | "[" <dotnum> "]"
<dotnum> ::= <snum> "." <snum> "." <snum> "." <snum>
<snum> ::= one, two, or three digits representing a decimal
integer value in the range 0 through 255
Therefore,
HELO [199.103.176.41]
looks like it is acceptable.
--
System Administrator
See complete headers for address, homepage and phone numbers
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances o... Hitesh Patel
- RE: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances o... Stefan Paletta
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances o... Sam
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instan... Andy Smith
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail in... Sam
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmai... Russell Nelson
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent ... Kai MacTane
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent ... David Villeger
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diff... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Eric Shafto
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Dave Sill
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diff... D. J. Bernstein
