> From:  Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:  18 May 1999 15:47:26 -0000
>
> Delivery Status Notice.  It's an attempt to solve every possible
> problem related to email delivery, including bounces, delayed
> messages, vacation responses, and changes of email address.
> Unfortunately, it's so complicated that it hasn't had sufficient
> penetration to be really useful.

Just to change the subject and to tie it into a previous thread, I'd like to
point out that the lack of this characteristic is one of the reasons why both 
Fred L. and I were defending RFC2369 for list headers.

Simplicity is good.  Isn't there a quote along the line of "as simple as 
possible, but no simpler"?  It wasn't about standards, but it should be.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 virCIO
+1 512 432 4046                 4314 Avenue C                    O-
http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/   Austin, TX  78751-3709
                                +1 512 374 0500

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
      but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.


PGP signature

Reply via email to