> David Harris writes:
> > e-mail so it will go to the files .qmail-bar and .qmail-bouncer. But
first,
> > notice the .qmail-foo-owner, which should cause all e-mail going through
> > .qmail-foo to acquire .qmail-foo-owner as the sender.
>
> Says who?
Says dot-qmail(5) section "EXTENSION ADDRESSES" paragraphs seven and eight.
I know about this sender address rewriting because I picked apart every line
of the source code of qmail-local.c on another project.
> > This make sense to anyone else there?
>
> Nope. sendmail != qmail.
I know. Anyway, I never learned sendmail but just ripped it out of my system
and installed qmail because qmail is better.
> --
> Sam
- David Harris
Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 5:53 PM
Cc: qmail-list
Subject: Re: Bug in rewriting of sender address?
David Harris writes:
> e-mail so it will go to the files .qmail-bar and .qmail-bouncer. But
first,
> notice the .qmail-foo-owner, which should cause all e-mail going through
> .qmail-foo to acquire .qmail-foo-owner as the sender.
Says who?
> This make sense to anyone else there?
Nope. sendmail != qmail.
--
Sam
