Maybe, but I wouldn't really compare mutt to either of those.. Those are both
low-feature command line mail readers no?
mutt is still faster than pine for mbox.. and it handles maildir format
(much) faster than mbox.
--Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 1999 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: Pine, Mutt, and Maildir
: "Adam D. McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: | I used mutt with a large (>1500 message) mailbox file once and the
performance
: | was way worse than with large maildirs.
:
: So mutt has two problems, then. Neither bsd mail nor mh has difficulty
: with much bigger inboxes.
:
:
