: > I'd really like to get back to the main thing, which is how the
: > client smtp can get to decide the form of the VERP, rather than

: The client can get to decide right now.  There's nothing to stop the client
: from doing that.

The client is not allowed to use any other separator other than '-',
or any prefix other than his own local, or to include a cookie in
or a suffix to the VERP expansion.  To me this is overly restrictive.
It should not be necessary to require that compliant MTAs implement
qmail-style extension addresses.

Your other points are well taken.  I shan't be arguing them.

-harold

Reply via email to