On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Jim Arnott wrote:
> CONCLUSION:
> The queue is very disk intensive and all writes are fsync'ed.
they are supposed to be! anything else risks you loosing messages if the
system crashes
> Things to try:
>
> (thanks to David Dyer-Bennet,Daemeon Reiydelle, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Remove the fsync call in qmail-queue.c
> Use a battery backed ram drive.
> Send directly before queing and queue those that fail (does qmail
> support this)
> Performance tune the system
> SCSI controller with write-back cache
> Run qmail-queue directly (qmail-queue does the fsync's though)
+++++++ stop using splogger
Richard
