> On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Jim Arnott wrote:
>
> > CONCLUSION:
> > The queue is very disk intensive and all writes are fsync'ed.
>
> they are supposed to be! anything else risks you loosing messages if the
> system crashes
> > Things to try:
> >
> > (thanks to David Dyer-Bennet,Daemeon Reiydelle, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
> > Remove the fsync call in
> > Use a battery backed ram drive.
> > Send directly before queing and queue those that fail (does qmail
> > support this)
> > Performance tune the system
> > SCSI controller with write-back cache
> > Run qmail-queue directly (qmail-queue does the fsync's though)
>
> +++++++ stop using splogger
I dont use the splogger, I use cyclog.
Also qmail-queue does not log (as far as I know) and in this "experiment"
I did not evaen have qmail-send running as stated in my original message.
-jim
>
> Richard
>
