[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Would there be any reason not to use supervise for qmail-start?
I can't think of a good reason not to.
>I notice that much documentation (I'm still working on merging
>the various sources of documentation and resolving apparent
>conflicts)
Differences aren't necessarily conflicts. There's more than one way to
skin a cat, you know.
>shows starting qmail-smtpd with supervise and tcpserver
>but just starts qmail-start by itself.
Look at "Life with qmail":
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
>What I want is a clean way to shut qmail down, either smtp side
>(because I don't want anything coming in on the network) or the
>local side (because I might be messing with delivery targets) or
>both (because I'm shutting the whole system down).
A very slight modification to the "qmail" script in LWQ will allow
this.
-Dave
