Re: supervise and qmail

[Dave Sill]

"Petr Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On 7 Oct 99, at 9:09, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> I can't think of a good reason not to [run qmail-start under
>> supervise].
>
>Um, like, qmail-start only spawns a few daemons and then goes 
>away, doesn't it?

No, not exactly. It starts a few daemons then exec's
qmail-send. qmail-start goes away, but its PID is inherited by
qmail-start.

-Dave