David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 October 1999 at 00:50:49 -0400
>
> > Here it is. I just went back and looked it up to be sure. Section 2.4.1:
> >
> > ===
> > ... In general, a relay SMTP SHOULD assume that the
> > message content it has received is valid and, assuming that the envelope
> > permits doing so, relay it without inspecting that content.
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Well, this is stated right in the middle of a lengthy discussion on 8bit
> > message contents/transparency issues, so they might be referring to that
> > issue alone. Still, something like that just jumps up and grabs your
> > attention.
>
> What leaps out at me is that it's about *relaying*, not about
> accepting mail for local delivery.
> --
> David Dyer-Bennet **Update your records, forwarding expires soon** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ (photos) Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
> http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b (sf) http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ Ouroboros Bookworms
> Join the 20th century before it's too late!
Good point!
--
Phil Howard | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phil | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipal | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dot | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
