Re: getting qmail to retry

[Phil Howard]

Sam wrote:

> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_F=E4rber?= writes:
> 
> > > On second thought, I really don't want to know what these people want to
> > > do with SMTP.  Ugh, what a frightening thought...
> > 
> > It's not a new version of SMTP if that is what you're afraid of. It only  
> > collects some important extensions (such as Extended SMTP/EHLO) and  
> > clarifications.
> 
> No, it does more than just that.  I just read it.  My initial suspicions
> were correct.

So what does it suggest doing that doesn't conform to the standard?

-- 
Phil Howard | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  phil      | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      at    | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ipal      | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     dot    | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  net       | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]