On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 12:21:23AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the same IP-address, with the consequence, that the reverse-mapping
> 1.2.3.4 PTR will point to just one of the n hosts. What's the general
> opinion on how "legal" this is?
This is perfectly legal.
But you can also
4 IN PTR virt1.com.
IN PTR virt2.com.
IN PTR virt3.com.
IN PTR virt4.com.
IN PTR virt5.com.
This is legal, too.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake
Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | realize you haven't
D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
- MX question related to diff. A and MX record Einar Bordewich
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Florian G. Pflug
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Markus Stumpf
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX re... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and M... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and M... Russell Nelson
- Re: MX question related to diff. A ... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and M... Markus Stumpf
- Re: MX question related to diff. A ... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff... Markus Stumpf
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Einar Bordewich
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Russell Nelson
- Configuration problem Rohit Khamkar
- RE: Configuration problem Steve Kapinos
- New Config. problem Rohit Khamkar
- Re: New Config. problem Dave Sill
