On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:43:37AM -0600, David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > True; but if you're modifying existing files, the directory data to > locate it is already safely on disk; only the timestamp might be > wrong. This isn't the qmail situation, but it's an important real > situation, and suggests a reason why it makes sense to to separate > file sync and directory sync. Maybe. Another situation is when dealing with several files in the same directory. You need to fsync each file, but you only need to fsync the directory once.
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupda... Andre Oppermann
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupda... Jeff Hayward
- Re: egg on MY face Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Anthony DeBoer
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Egg on my face Dave Sill
- Re: Egg on my face Sam
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Andre Oppermann
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Russell Nelson
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Magnus Bodin
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Andre Oppermann
- Re: Linux kernel turning for m... Len Budney
- Re: Logging information about each email. Bill Parker
- Re: Logging information about each email. Chris Johnson
- Re: Logging information about each email. Timothy L. Mayo
- Re: Logging information about each email. Greg Owen
