On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Andre Oppermann wrote: > I'm not sure if we're communicating. Does FFS offer the guarantee that > when link() succeeds, the hard link exists on the physical disk? Yes. Are you certain? My understanding (possibly wrong) is that the only guarantee is that if you do link() then unlink(), that the unlink will not be committed to disk before the link. Soft updates is all about letting the link() be asyncronous and still meet the guarantee. -- Jeff Hayward
- Re: Egg on my face Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- FFS with softupdates (Re: Journalling and email loss) Magnus Bodin
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Len Budney
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Andre Oppermann
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Len Budney
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates cmikk
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Andre Oppermann
- Re: egg on MY face Jeff Hayward
- Re: egg on MY face Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Anthony DeBoer
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Egg on my face Dave Sill
- Re: Egg on my face Sam
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux kernel ....) David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux kernel ....) Bruno Wolff III
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux kernel ....) Andre Oppermann
