On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
>Oh neat! A *new* gratuitious incompatibility! How clever!
>
> > 2) _IF_ we decide to distribute this its under gpl
> > right?
>
>Nope. You can't distribute qmail sources or binaries with a modified
>qmail-conf.
>
>--
>-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
To be more specific, I believe you cannot distribute a modified qmail
source or binary, at all, correct? Nothing can be modified, or am i wrong?
And, the above example is specifically why the license is the way it is :)
Support headaches, incompatible nightmares, etc, etc. Now maybee the qmail
license haters may realize at least partially, the logic.
_ __ _____ __ _________
______________ /_______ ___ ____ /______ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/ \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[---------------------------------------------[system info]-----------]
10:05pm up 36 days, 6:02, 4 users, load average: 0.09, 0.16, 0.19
