"Bryan White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Do you have any feel for how to evaluate what is an optimum number of >remotes? Measure the delivery rate at various settings of concurrencyremote. Choose the setting that yields the highest delivery rate. >At 400 remotes I still have 80% CPU idle time. 400 qmail-remote processes running, or concurrencyremote=400? Some systems never hit their concurrencyremote due to I/O restriction. >The load average >is around 4. This suggests to me that the system is limited by disk I/O, >network I/O or the responsiveness of remote servers. You should be able to monitor disk I/O rates and see if they go up as concurrencyremote is raised. Same with network I/O. >... If it is the responsiveness of remote servers then more remotes >will help. So add more remotes. If it helps, you aren't I/O (network or disk) limited yet. -Dave
- QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneous Issues Chun Hoh
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneou... Steve Wolfe
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Bob Rogers
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneou... Bryan White
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Peter van Dijk
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Steve Wolfe
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Misc... Neil Schemenauer
- Re: QMail Performance Question & ... Steve Wolfe
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Misc... Bryan White
- RE: QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneou... Matthew B. Henniges
- RE: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Flemming Funch
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Misc... Neil Schemenauer
- Re: QMail Performance Question & ... Flemming Funch
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Misc... markd
- Re: QMail Performance Question & ... markd
- RE: QMail Performance Question & ... Steve Craft
- Re: QMail Performance Question &... John White
- Re: QMail Performance Questi... Neil Schemenauer
- Re: QMail Performance Qu... John White