On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 10:09:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boy a few early morning typos here. Some corrections: > While it's hard to tell without looking, by guess is that your inbound > submission rate is killing the spindle that your disk lives on. That would be "that your queue lives on". > That suggests to me that something is awry. I have never seen any properly > setup system achieve the configured concurrencyremote. That would be "any properly setup system *NOT* achieve the configured concurrencyremote.". In other words, expect to reach your concurrencyremote. Not getting their when everything appears right, is a sign of some other underlying problem. Now lemme go check the dosage level on that coffee machine... Regards.
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Neil Schemenauer
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Misc... Steve Wolfe
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Bryan White
- RE: QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneous Iss... Matthew B. Henniges
- RE: QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneou... Flemming Funch
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... Neil Schemenauer
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Misc... Flemming Funch
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscella... markd
- RE: QMail Performance Question & Misc... markd
- RE: QMail Performance Question & Misc... Steve Craft
- Re: QMail Performance Question & ... John White
- Re: QMail Performance Question &... Neil Schemenauer
- Re: QMail Performance Questi... John White
- Re: QMail Performance Question & Miscellaneous Iss... Ricardo D. Albano
