On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 07:43:08AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > Ben Giddings:
>
> > (As an aside, qmail looks like a great, highly flexible program, but
> > man the source needs work. Virtually no comments anywhere,
> > meaningless variable and function names. Not a fun thing to search
> > through when you're trying to figure something out.)
>
> i give stags a few seconds and then browse through the sources without problems.
> i think they are a delight to read!
I agree, I am not even a programmer (unless you count bash) and I am
generally able to easily read through the source and find the part I need.
--Adam
