> Nice cover. So when you said "I was thinking of suggesting THAT > ONE but IT > isn't very secure", you were actually talking about the POP3 > protocol and not > qmail-pop3d specifically? If that's the case then why did you > reply at all, > and in such an ambiguous way? You certainly didn't answer the poster's > question. Well yeah, but I wanted to see what would come of it. SSL I have never used and it never came to mind until someone mentioned it. I was just making a statement in general about standard use of qmail-pop3d. Anyway, thanks for clarification :> Brett Manager InterPlanetary Solutions http://ipsware.com/ <http://ipsware.com/>
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP server Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP se... Joe Kelsey
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP se... clemensF
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP se... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP se... clemensF
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP se... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP se... clemensF
- Re: The most secure POP server clemensF
- RE: The most secure POP server Brett Randall
- Re: The most secure POP server Adam McKenna
- Re: The most secure POP server Brett Randall
- Re: The most secure POP server Thomas Neumann
- Re: The most secure POP server schinder
- Re: The most secure POP server Peter van Dijk
- Re: The most secure POP server clemensF
- Re: The most secure POP server asantos
