> Nice cover.  So when you said "I was thinking of suggesting THAT
> ONE but IT
> isn't very secure", you were actually talking about the POP3
> protocol and not
> qmail-pop3d specifically?  If that's the case then why did you
> reply at all,
> and in such an ambiguous way?  You certainly didn't answer the poster's
> question.

Well yeah, but I wanted to see what would come of it. SSL I have never used
and it never came to mind until someone mentioned it. I was just making a
statement in general about standard use of qmail-pop3d.

Anyway, thanks for clarification :>

Brett

Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/ <http://ipsware.com/>

Reply via email to