> The problem with re-using the same SMTP session for multiple messages, etc, > is the high-latency inherent in the protocol. DJB found an easy way around > that. That's not, what we are talking about. It's about creating multiple messages when it is really ONE with many receivers going to ONE destination. It may be that it is not a common case, but there are sites (mine is among them :) where this IS a very common case. If that multiplies with large sized messages (also common here - please forget hints about educating users to use other protocols ...) qmail's delivery strategy is problematic. Regards, Frank
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Frank Tegtmeyer
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Greg Owen
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Russell Nelson
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Charles Cazabon
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Charles Cazabon
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Abdul Rehman Gani
- orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John R. Dunning
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... David Dyer-Bennet
- orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... John R. Dunning
- Attitude Michael T. Babcock
