-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 21 Jul 00, at 10:58, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> >My MTA should get the messages out as soon as possible. I have
> >seen the benchmarks, and I know that my MTA does exactly that.
>
> Is it as fast as possible? In the situation above, what I suggest
> should happen is actually faster and makes better use of network
> resources than qmail's current implementation.
I really suggest you to sift through the archives first. My MTA really
does faster, even in this situation: The round-trip times around here
are too long. The less round-trips, the faster the mail gets through.
Easy as that.
> Am I really the only one that feels this way? Does nobody else agree
> with me or recognize my concerns? Are my suggestions really so far
> out there that everyone is willing to write me off as a radical?
It's not that; but we've seen the points you raise quite a few times.
It took me quite some time to verify the facts and remove the
mental blocks - a year ago, I'd back you up with most of your
concerns.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
iQA/AwUBOXhZxVMwP8g7qbw/EQKtiwCfSyQff2m3B6AXm8uUDfx+Ys52lqIAnje7
I3+va25QS2bt7WAQ22cb+toC
=ECc7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
[Tom Waits]
