3) Opening M connections (where M < N) and sending the messages down those M pipes without marking the message as having gone through a "could not connect to mail server" situation but queuing it for that MX instead. ?? Dave Sill wrote: > Mark Mentovai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Why not? You can have your cake and eat it too. Efficient network > >utilization doesn't mean delayed or slow delivery. > > Say you have 100 different messages to deliver to various users at > AOL. Which will be faster: > > 1) Opening one connection to a single AOL MX and feeding them through > single-file, or > > 2) Opening N connections to M AOL MX's and feeding one message to > each? > > Answer: 2
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Jon Rust
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... David Dyer-Bennet