I understand the point you're correcting (of mine) but I would like a clarification on Qmail's behaviour when a given message is about to be delivered and the foreign host refuses the connection because it has too many incoming sessions open. Peter van Dijk wrote: > Also, the other hosts will get into the connection-backlog and get their > turn. That's the beauty of qmail using one connection per message - message > done, connection closed, next in connection queue gets it's turn. A qmail > box delivering to another qmail box will never chew up all it's incoming > connections for a long time, they will nicely rotate. A sendmail box *is* > able to cause that DoS.
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb... John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb... Jon Rust
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb... David Dyer-Bennet
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Julian Brown
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Dave Sill
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Frank Tegtmeyer
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Greg Owen
