"Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That said, I have still seen nothing about the licensing of his > software besides that he doesn't care about anything that isn't > implicitly illegal. See <URL:http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html>. paul
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: licensing Michael T. Babcock
- Re: licensing Vince Vielhaber
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Charles Cazabon
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Nathan J. Mehl
- Qmail distribution terms Russell Nelson
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
