[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >That said, in a case-law country, I can do pretty much whatever I think >is legal to do until he sues me. At that point, the courts decide. > >Most importantly, will he allow full-modification and redistribution >with a new name (GPL style). IE, forking. It's clear from http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html that that would be against his wishes without his prior approval. Rest assured that Dan is willing to engage in a legal battle. Consider Bernstein v. Justice. -Dave
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: licensing Michael T. Babcock
- Re: licensing Vince Vielhaber
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Charles Cazabon
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Nathan J. Mehl
- Qmail distribution terms Russell Nelson
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... markd
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock