Re: secrets and lies

[Raul Miller]

On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:34:23AM -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> He wrote it all -- its all DJB's theories -- they may be right or
> wrong, but he's not a lawyer so its not even really worth trusting his
> theories at all.

Except that 

[1] he's the author, which means he owns all copy rights.

So, his expressed intent has some legal significance in this context.

[2] he provides very specific legal references, including a hyperlink
to the text of the relevant law.

So, those references are worth trusting.

On the other hand:  you're not the author of the software, you've not
provided any legal references, and you're not a lawyer.  [The same
applies to me.]

-- 
Raul