Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:34:23AM -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > > He wrote it all -- its all DJB's theories -- they may be right or > > wrong, but he's not a lawyer so its not even really worth trusting his > > theories at all. > > Except that ... > [2] he provides very specific legal references, including a hyperlink > to the text of the relevant law. That's true of softwarelaw.html, but this bit of the thread was about rights.html, which includes no such references. paul
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Vinko Vrsalovic
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Russ Allbery
- RE: secrets and lies zone
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Felix von Leitner
- Re: secrets and lies Greg Hudson
- Re: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: secrets and lies Romeyn Prescott
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
