Scott D. Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Was the issue about an MX pointing to a CNAME ever resolved? Yes; it's verboten. If you do it, don't expect to receive 100% of the mail people try to send to you. Also; please start a new thread when posting a new question; your message showed up in the middle of the "Newbies -- fried, or flame-broiled?" thread. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Markus Stumpf
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Louis Theran
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Felix von Leitner
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Barley
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Henning Brauer
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Barley
- HELL, STOP IT (was: Re: List Courtesy (... Markus Stumpf
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Henning Brauer
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Scott D. Yelich
- MXs pointing to CNAMES Alex Pennace
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie que... Charles Cazabon
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Dave Sill
- quickie ? Barry Smoke
- Re: quickie ? Alex Pennace
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) David Dyer-Bennet
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Jamin Collins
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Amitai Schlair
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Robin S. Socha
