Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:34:59 -0800
> From: Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I can't see any circumstances where any of Dan's sofware can be deemed
> closed source.
>
> It is not the case that all software is either open source or closed
> source. There is a broad continuum of licensing possibilities.
>
> I already mentioned an important freedom which Dan does not permit.
> The lack of that freedom means that Dan's software is not open source.
> Saying that Dan's software is not open source does not mean that it is
> closed source. Dan's software is almost open source, it just isn't
> quite all the way there.
>
> Ian
http://courier.sourceforge.net/ appears to be a GPL'd qmail clone, more or
less. Why not use it instead, you want a GPL MTA?
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just when you think you're finally safe, the poets reappear