On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 08:05:20AM -0800, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you mean "someone@domain" as the complete address with no dots on the > right-hand side? Bear in mind that RFC 822 contains *no* address > canonicalization provisions; if you're expecting your local domain to be > appended to the RHS, you're outside the scope. Under RFC 822, the above > address indicates that one should deliver the mail to the MX record for > "domain." (and as a general rule, TLDs don't have MX records, although it > is technically legal). He probably means a domain with no dots. For example: discuss@opennic
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Markus Stumpf
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Brian
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Brian
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Felix von Leitner
- Re: RFC822 compliant? briank
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Andy Bradford
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC822 compliant? briank
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Johan Almqvist
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Bruno Wolff III
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Louis Theran
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Russell Nelson
- Re: RFC822 compliant? briank
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Markus Stumpf
- Re: RFC822 compliant? Russell Nelson
- Re: multilog logging with vpopmail Miguel Beccari
