Hi Marlon, Thanks very much for your reply. > > How about increasing your concurrencyremote to something > like 100? you most likely are hitting your limits. > Good point. Will try that tonight. I've gotten some problems before from ISP's blocking us when I went up to 240...I'm not quite sure what the highest polite limit on this should be. > > If you are running plain vanilla qmail, why not running 4 > instances at a time? each running under a different IP > address and under a different disk? then you would have a > concurrencyremote of a total of 400 and I/O is balanced > accross 4 disks. > This sounds really good. I think we'll try it out. > > you just have to modify your smtp injection script to load > balance accross the 4 instances. > > Thanks, > Marlon >
- Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Thomas Duterme
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings asantos
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Thomas Duterme
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Thomas Duterme
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Henning Brauer
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mail... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dyn... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dyn... Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Jenny Holmberg
