Wayne Chu wrote:
>
> No, I am NOT spamming.
>
> Our company runs serveral daily e-newsletter, with totally about a
> half million of subscribers. We are planning to make an "open"
> newsletter plateform, let our web site members create their own
> personal newsletter ( authenticated and supervised by our staff to
> prevent spam mail ). we estimated the total number of subscribers and
> the number of newsletter will grow even more. Surely our member
> would want their newsletters to be sent ASAP. So we have to
> increase concurrency.
Ah.. So you are not a spammer, except you assume all your
"customers" want your email. Besides that moral issue,
do you have measured information about the delivery
statistics of qmail version other options?
>
> And our company is not in USA. In our country, there are only few
> large major ISPs dominate the market. I don't know what's the case
> in US, but nearly half of our current subscribers come from only 4 ISPs.
> We encountered only slight SMTP blocking problems now. But we
> expect the problem will grow with our subscribers and concurrency settings.
Are you saying that your country is a pirate economy?
Shall I embarrase you and trace your email? or do you wish
to reveal which country you are from?
Does your country harbor pirates?
>
> That's why we are looking for ways to deliver large number of
> newsletters with maximum speed possible, without overloading remote
> mail servers. If my questions cause controversy, I apologize.
> But never did I intend to abuse Internet e-mail.
Sir. If your users are on your machines, you can just copy your
emails to thier directories. But.. it seems like your users
are spread over other peoples machines. Hence.. by definition,
you are a spammer, sir.
Ken Jones
