asantos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 6 December 2000 at 22:07:47 -0100
> From: David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Most of the points were matters of personal opinion, or were true, or
> >were not too important. In this particular case, however, you are
> >accusing some of the most valuable contributors to the list of bad
> >faith, and misrepresenting their actions. I consider that pretty
> >important, and needing a response. It's also an area where it's best
> >for people *not* to try to defend themselves generally; that always
> >looks self-interested. So that's what I commented on.
>
>
> No, I wasn't accusing the most valuable contributors, but the most
> remarkable non-contributors.
I think we're going to have to just agree to differ on this one,
then.
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
