On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:59:18PM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Not to be picky, but why not call the file qmtproutes instead of
> mailroutes? :-)
Because it contains both SMTP and QMTP routes. I figured that would be a
better idea, and so did other people.
Quoting Alex:
> I like the mailroutes idea. The relationship between nested wildcard
> entries may be more difficult to manage when such relationships span
> smtproutes and qmtproutes.
...and I can only agree.
'twas easier to implement, too :->
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
