David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Um, most reporting measured results from optimizing high-traffic
> qmail-based mail servers have found that disk activity on the queue
> disk is the first limit they hit.
How about, if the first delivery fails, pass it off to a server with
some disks. Why not pre-process with qmail-remote before queueing?
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Five seconds of light is a lot of data.
- Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ? Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... David L. Nicol
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/que... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmai... Mark Delany
- RE: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Austad, Jay
