Re: Why so few qmail-remote processes

[Greg White]

On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 09:30:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> "Jacques <Frip'> WERNERT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I know that well so I put "5" but I can't take too much time to send my
> > mails ...
> 
> Reducing queuelifetime will not help you deliver mail faster.  If you
> really want to retry failed deliveries more often, send qmail-send
> SIGHUP every once in a while.
> 
> 
> paul
I'm no wizard or anything, but isn't ALRM the signal you want for that?
Doesn't HUP just reread locals and rcpthosts?

GW