> From: Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 01:49:24 +0300
>
> Matthew Patterson wrote:
> >
> > I'm not very good at reading RFCs, so I can't be sure myself. Can anyone
> > confirm that qmail 1.3 with the BigDNS and queuevar patches will be
> > compliant with whatever standards may come out of RFCs 2821 and 2822?
>
> It could literally take years for RFCs to become standards, if they ever
> do. You don't have to worry too soon, I think.
2821 and 2822 are clarifications of 821 and 822; they don't throw away the
existing standards. qmail should already be just as compatible as it was with
the old standards.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C
Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500
My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.
PGP signature
