Re: Can MX record be CNAME?

[Charles Cazabon]

q question <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This would have been easier if you'd used real names.  However...
> 
> Why did you tell Peter this would have been easier if he had used real 
> names?

Because I believe that it would have been clearer if he had used real names?
My eyes quickly get tired of trying to distinguish "a.b.c" and "foo.b.c" and
"foo.a.b.c", etc, etc...

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------