At 08:34 AM 5/3/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > Unfortunately I do not control my PTR records so I have to do the dns name
> > change with CNAME.
> >
> > My questions are:
> >
> > Can MX record point to a CNAME?
>
>No, never.
Charles,
Why can't it be a CNAME? Is there a reason for this? I am currently using it
as a CNAME and it's been working fine for a year or so... If there is a good
reason for it, I sure would like to know so I can make changes.
Oh I have this currently:
IN NS ns1.webgoku.com.
IN NS ns2.webgoku.com.
IN MX 10 mail.swishmail.com.
$ORIGIN swishmail.com.
;
; Setup forward DNS for all hosts
IN A 63.165.246.3
www IN A 63.165.246.3
ftp IN CNAME swishmail.com.
mail IN CNAME swishmail.com.
Or did you mean that you can't have something like this:
IN MX 10 mail
IN A 63.165.246.3
www IN A 63.165.246.3
mail IN CNAME swishmail.com.
Thanks,
__
Kris.
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Peter Peltonen
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Markus Stumpf
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Peter Peltonen
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Peter van Dijk
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Scott D. Yelich
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- error with sqwebmail Brendan McAlpine
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? James Raftery
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Kris von Mach
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Colin Palmer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
