>
> qmail includes qmail-pop3d, which does everything I need it
> to. What is your
> criteria for "better"?
>
I said better in terms of performance.
I was using sendmail/qpopper from several years ago and last
month I switch to qmail and (thanks god ;-) it's working ok.
I'd read in the list several messages talking about pop servers
but nobody named "qpopper", so I was asking for a good reason
to change qpopper.
do you think qmail-pop3d is a good choice?
PD: I'm not using Maildir
PD2: Sorry for my english!
--yapedu/xgnu
