On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Jos Backus allegedly wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 05:58:49PM +0000, Mark wrote:
> > It's a bummer that ktrace is like that on FreeBSD. It doesn't show the
> > *current* system call that the process is sitting on. Conversely,
> > truss on Solaris does this nicely...
>
> But FreeBSD does have a (procfs-based) truss.
Right. But it suffers from the same problem that ktrace does in that
it starts with the next system call, not the current one. Leastwise it
does on a 4.3 I have access to, do you get something different?
Regards.
