Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Suppose the input numbers are 2 4 6 8 10 12. Suppose the hash size is >8. Then the buckets are 2 4 6 0 2 4. Note the bad distribution. >Suppose the hash size is 7. Then the buckers are 2 4 6 1 3 5. Note >the good distribution. OK, thanks, that finally clicked. Now you know why I'm not a mathematician or computer scientist. :-) -Dave
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Adam McKenna
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Jost Krieger
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Dave Sill
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Dave Sill
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Dave Sill
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Dave Sill
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Dave Sill
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Dave Sill
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Jörgen Persson
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Why conf-split prime? Jörgen Persson